Assuming you work, how, exactly, do you see your job?
I believe it should be a trade. A trade is something done by mutual consent - both sides should believe that they’re “coming on top” (note: not necessarily deceiving the other side!), that what they’re getting is worth more to them than what they’re giving. For instance, the worker may think something like “I like doing this, so if I’m paid to do it, so much the better”, while the employer thinks “what I pay him is nothing compared to the money his work makes me.”
To me, that’s how a job should be. If both sides are happy, fine. If one isn’t, the trade should be terminated. (I know socialists and other collectivists will hate me for that, because they believe a worker should be able to hang on to the job when the employer doesn’t want him any more, because he “needs” the job…)
If an employer doesn’t want or need a worker anymore, he should fire him (with appropriate compensation, unless there was “just cause”, like him not doing his part of the contract, namely, working). If a worker doesn’t like the working conditions, or the relationship between work and pay, he should leave (after finding a new job, of course). To me, this is obvious.
To most people, that is inconceivable.
Continue reading ‘A job: trade, favor or duty?’
Recent Comments