<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Way of the Mind &#187; bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wayofthemind.org/tag/bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:59:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>20000 more U.S. troops to Iraq&#8230; what for?</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/01/11/20000-more-us-troops-to-iraq-what-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/01/11/20000-more-us-troops-to-iraq-what-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter-david]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/01/11/20000-more-us-troops-to-iraq-what-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, Bush is really doing it. Is it just me, or does this remind you as well of &#8220;pointy-haired bosses&#8221; putting more and more money into a project that everyone already knows is doomed to failure, and will bring no profit at all, just because &#8220;well, if we pull back now, it will mean that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, Bush is really <a href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&#038;storyID=2007-01-11T151221Z_01_L11242005_RTRUKOC_0_UK-IRAQ.xml&#038;WTmodLoc=Top+News-C1-Headline-9">doing it</a>.</p>
<p>Is it just me, or does this remind you as well of &#8220;pointy-haired bosses&#8221; putting more and more money into a project that everyone already knows is doomed to failure, and will bring no profit at all, just because <em>&#8220;well, if we pull back now, it will mean that whatever was already spent is lost&#8221;</em>? Which is, if you think about it for 5 seconds, a fallacy &#8211; what was spent is <i><b>already</b></i> lost, the choice is between losing even <i>more</i>, or not.</p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t for the fact that the main goal of the war &#8212; and, in that, it&#8217;s been an absolute <i>success</i> &#8212; was always to make it so that criticizing the president in any way is &#8220;unpatriotic&#8221;, I&#8217;d think that the only reason that the U.S. is still there is due to the above &#8211; better to bury more money (and, in this case, human lives) than to admit a mistake.</p>
<p>Peter David has some nice <a href="http://peterdavid.malibulist.com/archives/005084.html">comments on Bush&#8217;s speech</a> as well, plus a newer <a href="http://peterdavid.malibulist.com/archives/005086.html">post</a>, where he writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>The classic definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been sending troops into Iraq. The result? Civil War, fighting, and young people dying.</p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s solution? Send troops into Iraq.</p>
<p>Different result?</p>
<p>No reason to believe so.</p>
<p>Someone should do a dictionary entry for &#8220;Insanity&#8221; with Bush&#8217;s picture next to it.</p></blockquote>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2012 <strong><a href="http://www.wayofthemind.org">Way of the Mind</a></strong> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/01/11/20000-more-us-troops-to-iraq-what-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

