<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On &#8220;God exists/doesn&#8217;t exist&#8221; and offensiveness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63364</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/#comment-63364</guid>
		<description>You have a really interesting blog, and I have put you on my list of blogs I follow through Bloglovin&#039;. 

I do believe in the existance of a God, but I really woudln&#039;t ever interpret the Bible literally. It was written a long time ago, and humans make mistakes and things come up and get lost through the ages. Looking for a reply!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a really interesting blog, and I have put you on my list of blogs I follow through Bloglovin&#8217;. </p>
<p>I do believe in the existance of a God, but I really woudln&#8217;t ever interpret the Bible literally. It was written a long time ago, and humans make mistakes and things come up and get lost through the ages. Looking for a reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63348</link>
		<dc:creator>Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/#comment-63348</guid>
		<description>Of course &#039;God&#039; exists... in the dictionary.

As does &#039;zealous&#039;, &#039;inflammatory&#039;, and &#039;pretentious&#039;.

Humanism?

Shallow ego-entertainment. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_mechanism)

Two cents ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course &#8216;God&#8217; exists&#8230; in the dictionary.</p>
<p>As does &#8216;zealous&#8217;, &#8216;inflammatory&#8217;, and &#8216;pretentious&#8217;.</p>
<p>Humanism?</p>
<p>Shallow ego-entertainment. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_mechanism" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_mechanism</a>)</p>
<p>Two cents <img src='http://www.wayofthemind.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittney Herrera</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63336</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittney Herrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/#comment-63336</guid>
		<description>Blah Blah Blah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah Blah Blah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Rimmer</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63335</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Rimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/#comment-63335</guid>
		<description>Whether one believes in God or not is not their choice. Nothing is of anyone&#039;s will. There is no such thing as choice/will. Whatever anyone believes is certain. Everything is fate. I do not believe in God. I think that it&#039;s foolish. Logic rules me. Fate rules me. Have faith in this. It&#039;s certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether one believes in God or not is not their choice. Nothing is of anyone&#8217;s will. There is no such thing as choice/will. Whatever anyone believes is certain. Everything is fate. I do not believe in God. I think that it&#8217;s foolish. Logic rules me. Fate rules me. Have faith in this. It&#8217;s certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcy</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63329</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/#comment-63329</guid>
		<description>In that post that you linked to, about the Four Horsemen, you said, &quot;Nowhere else, from my experience, does something like this happen. “I think you’re wrong” is not an insult or a personal offense… except in religion. I think this is a very important point.&quot;

I think it happens all the time.  People seem to take personal offense at everything.  I&#039;ve found it true regarding vegetarianism.  All a vegetarian or vegan has to do is merely exist, and that sets some people off.

And another important, but often overlooked point is the age of the person involved.  I think it&#039;s quite common for people to become atheists (not to mention vegetarians) during their college or university years.  At that age, you&#039;ve been taught critical thinking, but yet you&#039;re young enough to know that you still have a lot to learn, so you&#039;re open to new ideas.

I was posting to a feminist board, and knowing that it&#039;s pretty common for feminists to be vegetarians, I simply asked how many of the women on the board happened to be vegetarians.  I got such vitriol for simply asking a question.  I didn&#039;t even say anything about it being wrong or immoral to eat animals.  I simply asked who was vegetarian.  And the most vitriol came from the older women, the ones in their 50&#039;s and 60&#039;s, and I think it&#039;s because as we age, we tend to think we become wiser and more knowledgeable.  We feel that we have a lot to offer the younger generations.  We don&#039;t want to admit that we have been doing something immoral for 5 or 6 decades.  Also, people want to feel that they are good people deep down.

And I think the age thing comes into play with atheism.  If someone is 40, 50, or even older, they don&#039;t want to face the idea that they have been stupid enough to be duped for all that time.  People not only think they are good deep down, but they think they are smart.  Too smart to be conned.  I think younger people are more likely to reject the beliefs they were taught as children, because they don&#039;t have years and years of reinforcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that post that you linked to, about the Four Horsemen, you said, &#8220;Nowhere else, from my experience, does something like this happen. “I think you’re wrong” is not an insult or a personal offense… except in religion. I think this is a very important point.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it happens all the time.  People seem to take personal offense at everything.  I&#8217;ve found it true regarding vegetarianism.  All a vegetarian or vegan has to do is merely exist, and that sets some people off.</p>
<p>And another important, but often overlooked point is the age of the person involved.  I think it&#8217;s quite common for people to become atheists (not to mention vegetarians) during their college or university years.  At that age, you&#8217;ve been taught critical thinking, but yet you&#8217;re young enough to know that you still have a lot to learn, so you&#8217;re open to new ideas.</p>
<p>I was posting to a feminist board, and knowing that it&#8217;s pretty common for feminists to be vegetarians, I simply asked how many of the women on the board happened to be vegetarians.  I got such vitriol for simply asking a question.  I didn&#8217;t even say anything about it being wrong or immoral to eat animals.  I simply asked who was vegetarian.  And the most vitriol came from the older women, the ones in their 50&#8242;s and 60&#8242;s, and I think it&#8217;s because as we age, we tend to think we become wiser and more knowledgeable.  We feel that we have a lot to offer the younger generations.  We don&#8217;t want to admit that we have been doing something immoral for 5 or 6 decades.  Also, people want to feel that they are good people deep down.</p>
<p>And I think the age thing comes into play with atheism.  If someone is 40, 50, or even older, they don&#8217;t want to face the idea that they have been stupid enough to be duped for all that time.  People not only think they are good deep down, but they think they are smart.  Too smart to be conned.  I think younger people are more likely to reject the beliefs they were taught as children, because they don&#8217;t have years and years of reinforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vjack</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63325</link>
		<dc:creator>vjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/#comment-63325</guid>
		<description>Good analysis. I think that either message when communicated to someone who disagrees with it communicates &quot;you&#039;re wrong,&quot; like you said. Of course, it is also interpreted in a number of interesting ways, as you described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis. I think that either message when communicated to someone who disagrees with it communicates &#8220;you&#8217;re wrong,&#8221; like you said. Of course, it is also interpreted in a number of interesting ways, as you described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raytheist</title>
		<link>http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63323</link>
		<dc:creator>raytheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemind.org/2008/12/17/on-god-existsdoesnt-exist-and-offensiveness/#comment-63323</guid>
		<description>&quot;You have wasted your life&quot;.    THANK YOU.    That is EXACTLY what I think of certain individuals.   

To be fair, I do also know many people of faith who have put their faith into action--public service, humanitarian aid, and generally manifesting a sense of equality and dignity toward all.  In my mind, those who turn their faith into a force for positive activity can&#039;t be entirely faulted -- they actually do good, regardless the internal (religious) motivation.  They &#039;do&#039; instead of &#039;talk&#039;.   And that&#039;s cool.  

But the majority of people (including myself when I was a fundamentalist evangelical Pentecostal Christian) invest their &#039;faith&#039; and time, money, energy into &quot;being holy&quot;, browbeating others, and generally being a pain in the butt to those around them.   And I admit that I was in that bunch.   And then I realized what a waste it was.   

thanks for writing this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have wasted your life&#8221;.    THANK YOU.    That is EXACTLY what I think of certain individuals.   </p>
<p>To be fair, I do also know many people of faith who have put their faith into action&#8211;public service, humanitarian aid, and generally manifesting a sense of equality and dignity toward all.  In my mind, those who turn their faith into a force for positive activity can&#8217;t be entirely faulted &#8212; they actually do good, regardless the internal (religious) motivation.  They &#8216;do&#8217; instead of &#8216;talk&#8217;.   And that&#8217;s cool.  </p>
<p>But the majority of people (including myself when I was a fundamentalist evangelical Pentecostal Christian) invest their &#8216;faith&#8217; and time, money, energy into &#8220;being holy&#8221;, browbeating others, and generally being a pain in the butt to those around them.   And I admit that I was in that bunch.   And then I realized what a waste it was.   </p>
<p>thanks for writing this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

