Comments on: Gullibility Test http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/ Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:53:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: TPO http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/comment-page-1/#comment-31264 TPO Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:24:35 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/#comment-31264 I agree with Noam Samuel. You have to be pretty damn gullible to believe everything on that test. Your high score is not a not complementary. I scored a 75 which would probably be about right if you go by scientific facts instead of conspiracy theory's. I agree with Noam Samuel. You have to be pretty damn gullible to believe everything on that test. Your high score is not a not complementary. I scored a 75 which would probably be about right if you go by scientific facts instead of conspiracy theory’s.

]]> By: Jade http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/comment-page-1/#comment-30038 Jade Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:29:22 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/#comment-30038 Some of the answers are quite debatable though . ie the Hiroshima bomb one, here in Australia were taught to have an open mind about that event and make up our mind for ourselves whether it was dropped to end the war or for, as the gullibility test says to kill the Japanese. -> Its more a question based on the writer's opinion rather than fact? Still a free thinker though :P .. Only scored 79 :) Some of the answers are quite debatable though . ie the Hiroshima bomb one, here in Australia were taught to have an open mind about that event and make up our mind for ourselves whether it was dropped to end the war or for, as the gullibility test says to kill the Japanese. -> Its more a question based on the writer’s opinion rather than fact?
Still a free thinker though :P .. Only scored 79 :)

]]> By: Mike http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/comment-page-1/#comment-27236 Mike Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:23:04 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/#comment-27236 What constitutes a non-gullible individual? Is it a person confirming to mainstream belief or one who embraces every conspiracy theory? Blissfully ignorant or Hopelessly paranoid? The test is just of how non-mainstream and conspiracy-seeking your views are. Disagreement should come from knowledge and analysis, and while many of the claims on the site might be true, they are partial and often unestablished, becoming political and biased themselves. What constitutes a non-gullible individual? Is it a person confirming to mainstream belief or one who embraces every conspiracy theory? Blissfully ignorant or Hopelessly paranoid?

The test is just of how non-mainstream and conspiracy-seeking your views are. Disagreement should come from knowledge and analysis, and while many of the claims on the site might be true, they are partial and often unestablished, becoming political and biased themselves.

]]> By: No Way http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/comment-page-1/#comment-27166 No Way Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:16:16 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/#comment-27166 Hey, I got a 91 % too. And I'm a theist. go figure ;> Hey, I got a 91 % too. And I’m a theist. go figure ;>

]]> By: Noam Samuel http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/comment-page-1/#comment-27104 Noam Samuel Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:17:10 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/#comment-27104 The question is whether you are gullible enough to believe everything on that test. I'd like to note, also, that it would be extremely easy to score 100% on the first time simply by selecting all non-mainstream opinions. They should include true mainstream opinions so that it would be an actual test and not just one of whether people are willing to bend their answers depending on the tester. The question is whether you are gullible enough to believe everything on that test.

I’d like to note, also, that it would be extremely easy to score 100% on the first time simply by selecting all non-mainstream opinions. They should include true mainstream opinions so that it would be an actual test and not just one of whether people are willing to bend their answers depending on the tester.

]]> By: Tina B. http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/comment-page-1/#comment-27086 Tina B. Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:38:26 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/#comment-27086 Your GF score is 88. (Out of a range of 0 - 100, where 0 = mind slave, and 100 = free thinker.) Mind slave Free thinker 0 (You) 100 Free Thinker Your GF score is 88.
(Out of a range of 0 - 100, where 0 = mind slave, and 100 = free thinker.)

Mind slave Free thinker
0 (You) 100
Free Thinker

]]> By: A Division by Zer0 » Blog Archive » Gullibility http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/comment-page-1/#comment-27085 A Division by Zer0 » Blog Archive » Gullibility Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:36:40 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2007/07/18/gullibility-test/#comment-27085 [...] the Way of the Mind I discovered this little test that at first sight seemed promising. I was initially skeptic of some [...] [...] the Way of the Mind I discovered this little test that at first sight seemed promising. I was initially skeptic of some [...]

]]>