Comments on: Liberals and Conservatives, part 2 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2006/03/28/liberals-and-conservatives-part-2/ Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:44:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Pedro Timóteo http://www.wayofthemind.org/2006/03/28/liberals-and-conservatives-part-2/#comment-424 Pedro Timóteo Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:16:01 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2006/03/28/liberals-and-conservatives-part-2/#comment-424 blueskelton: huh? Are you commenting on what I wrote, or on something entirely different? Because I don't see how your comment applies - I was just talking, here, about what the words mean, <b>not</b> attacking either side. blueskelton: huh? Are you commenting on what I wrote, or on something entirely different? Because I don’t see how your comment applies - I was just talking, here, about what the words mean, not attacking either side.

]]> By: blueskelton http://www.wayofthemind.org/2006/03/28/liberals-and-conservatives-part-2/#comment-420 blueskelton Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:08:45 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2006/03/28/liberals-and-conservatives-part-2/#comment-420 that was absolutely retarded and onesided i could point out that conservatives also have some perverse connatatons: "Conservatives are known to be braindead--greedy religious whackjobs that exploit God for their own monetary gain." that was absolutely retarded and onesided i could point out that conservatives also have some perverse connatatons: “Conservatives are known to be braindead–greedy religious whackjobs that exploit God for their own monetary gain.”

]]> By: Neal http://www.wayofthemind.org/2006/03/28/liberals-and-conservatives-part-2/#comment-406 Neal Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:26:49 +0000 http://www.wayofthemind.org/2006/03/28/liberals-and-conservatives-part-2/#comment-406 The historical "Liberal" was actually more like the modern "Libertarian". At some point, the word got adopted by the Democrats and now has somewhat of a perverse meaning to what it meant historically. It's a shame. I also would consider myself to be a Libertarian. You might enjoy my post on the difference between Democrats and Republicans (http://www.autodogmatic.com/index.php/a/2006/02/19/repubocrats_or_demolicans_what_s_the_dif) The historical “Liberal” was actually more like the modern “Libertarian”. At some point, the word got adopted by the Democrats and now has somewhat of a perverse meaning to what it meant historically. It’s a shame. I also would consider myself to be a Libertarian.

You might enjoy my post on the difference between Democrats and Republicans (http://www.autodogmatic.com/index.php/a/2006/02/19/repubocrats_or_demolicans_what_s_the_dif)

]]>