“Intelligent Design”, part 2

If you really believe that:

  1. Intelligent Design (ID) is not Creationism, or a disguise for it;
  2. ID is actually based on science, not faith;
  3. the current efforts to make schools teach ID as an “equally valid” alternative to Evolution in science classes are not an attempt to promote Christianity and religion in general;
  4. those efforts are, instead, a way to promote open-mindedness, alternatives to established beliefs, free thought, and to prevent belief in the theory of Evolution as dogma…

… then, surely, you must agree with this letter.

Right?

Related posts:

  1. Intelligent Design, PR and fallacies
  2. “Intelligent Design”
  3. More “intelligent” design
  4. The only debate on Intelligent Design that is worthy of its subject
  5. The problem with "Darwinism"

2 Responses to ““Intelligent Design”, part 2”


  1. 1 Anonymous

    There are no scientific evidence for intelligent disign

  2. 2 R Nicolas

    You can’t spell stupid without “id”

Comments are currently closed.







Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Portugal
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Portugal