«
»

“Intelligent Design”, part 2

If you really believe that:

  1. Intelligent Design (ID) is not Creationism, or a disguise for it;
  2. ID is actually based on science, not faith;
  3. the current efforts to make schools teach ID as an “equally valid” alternative to Evolution in science classes are not an attempt to promote Christianity and religion in general;
  4. those efforts are, instead, a way to promote open-mindedness, alternatives to established beliefs, free thought, and to prevent belief in the theory of Evolution as dogma…

… then, surely, you must agree with this letter.

Right?

No related posts.

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, August 18th, 2005 at 13:15 and is filed under intelligent design, religion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

2 Responses to ““Intelligent Design”, part 2”

  1. Anonymous says:
    November 10, 2005 at 20:31

    There are no scientific evidence for intelligent disign

  2. R Nicolas says:
    January 31, 2007 at 05:05

    You can’t spell stupid without “id”